If you work with PDFs regularly, you've probably used iLovePDF. It's one of the most popular online PDF tools, and for good reason — it covers a wide range of operations and the interface is clean. We built MakeMyPDF because we thought some things could be done differently, particularly around privacy and pricing. This comparison lays out where each tool excels and where it falls short, so you can pick the one that fits your workflow.
The quick version
iLovePDF is a mature product with a large team, mobile apps, and desktop software. MakeMyPDF is a focused web tool that processes most files directly in your browser without uploading them to a server. If privacy matters to you — and if you work with contracts, medical records, financial documents, or anything sensitive — that distinction is significant. If you need native mobile or desktop apps, iLovePDF currently has us beat.
Feature comparison
Both tools cover the core PDF operations. Here's how the feature sets stack up:
| Feature | MakeMyPDF | iLovePDF |
|---|---|---|
| Merge PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Split PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Compress PDF | Yes | Yes |
| PDF to Word | Yes | Yes |
| Word to PDF | Yes | Yes |
| PDF to Excel | Yes | Yes |
| Excel to PDF | Yes | Yes |
| PDF to PowerPoint | Yes | Yes |
| PowerPoint to PDF | Yes | Yes |
| PDF to JPG | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| JPG to PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| HTML to PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Rotate PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Crop PDF | Yes (client-side) | No |
| Add page numbers | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Watermark | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Sign PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Edit / annotate PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Redact PDF | Yes (client-side) | No |
| Unlock PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Protect PDF | Yes | Yes |
| OCR | Yes | Yes (premium) |
| Compare PDF | Yes (client-side) | No |
| PDF to PDF/A | Yes | Yes |
| Repair PDF | Yes | Yes |
| Scan to PDF | Yes (client-side) | Yes (mobile app) |
| AI Summarize | Yes | No |
| Translate PDF | Yes | No |
| Organize / reorder pages | Yes (client-side) | Yes (server) |
| Remove pages | Yes (client-side) | No (use organize) |
| Extract pages | Yes (client-side) | No (use split) |
| Desktop app | No (web only) | Yes |
| Mobile app | No (web only) | Yes |
| API for developers | No | Yes (paid) |
The table tells part of the story, but the real differences are in howthese features work, not just whether they exist. Let's dig into the areas where the two tools diverge most.
Privacy: the fundamental difference
When you merge two PDFs on iLovePDF, your files are uploaded to their servers. Their server combines them, and you download the result. The files are deleted after a period (they say two hours), and the connection is encrypted in transit. This is the standard model for online PDF tools — Smallpdf, Sejda, and most others work the same way.
When you merge two PDFs on MakeMyPDF, the files never leave your browser. The merge operation runs in JavaScript using pdf-lib, a client-side PDF manipulation library. Your files stay on your device the entire time. There's no upload, no server processing, and no deletion window to worry about. The same is true for splitting, rotating, cropping, watermarking, signing, redacting, and most other operations — look for the "client-side" labels in the table above.
Some operations genuinely require server-side processing. OCR needs a trained model that's too large to ship to the browser. PDF-to-Word conversion requires layout analysis that runs on our backend. For those tools, we do process files on our server — but we're upfront about which tools work locally and which don't.
Why does this matter? If you're merging a party invitation, it probably doesn't. But if you're working with employment contracts, medical records, tax returns, legal filings, or anything covered by GDPR, HIPAA, or internal compliance policies, the question of where your files go is not academic. Some organizations prohibit uploading documents to third-party servers entirely. With client-side processing, there's nothing to prohibit — the data never leaves the machine.
Pricing
iLovePDF uses a freemium model. Free users can process a limited number of files per day (typically one or two batch operations), and files are capped at a certain size. Their premium plan costs $7/month (billed annually) or $9/month billed monthly, and it removes those limits, unlocks OCR, and adds batch processing for larger workloads. They also sell a desktop application and an API with usage-based pricing.
MakeMyPDF is free. All tools, no file limits, no daily caps. We monetize through ads that appear below the tool interface — they never interrupt your workflow. No account required. No upsell prompts in the middle of processing a file.
The trade-off is obvious: iLovePDF's paid tier gives you an ad-free experience, and their API is valuable if you need to integrate PDF operations into automated workflows. If you process hundreds of files daily and need programmatic access, iLovePDF's API is a real product that we don't currently offer. But for individual use — the person who needs to merge five PDFs before a meeting, or compress a document before emailing it — free with no caps is hard to argue with.
Tool depth and edge cases
iLovePDF has been around since 2010. They've had over a decade to polish edge cases, handle unusual PDF structures, and optimize their server-side processing pipeline. Their compression tool, in particular, is excellent — it uses Ghostscript under the hood and produces impressively small files without visible quality loss.
MakeMyPDF's client-side compression is more limited. Running in the browser means we can strip metadata, remove duplicate objects, and optimize the PDF structure, but we can't re-encode embedded images at different quality levels the way a server-side tool with Ghostscript can. For heavy compression on image-dense PDFs, iLovePDF will likely produce smaller files. For text-heavy PDFs or moderate compression, the results are comparable.
On the other hand, MakeMyPDF offers several tools that iLovePDF doesn't: PDF redaction (permanently blacking out sensitive text), side-by-side PDF comparison, visual page cropping, AI-powered document summarization, and PDF translation. These reflect a different design philosophy — we'd rather ship tools that solve real problems than replicate every feature of every competitor.
User experience
Both tools follow a similar interaction pattern: select a tool, upload files (or in our case, drop them into the browser), configure options, process, download. Neither is complicated. iLovePDF has a slight edge in visual polish — their progress indicators, animations, and error messages have had years of iteration. PDF Toolkit's interface is clean and functional but newer.
One meaningful UX difference: because MakeMyPDF's client-side tools don't upload files, they're faster for small-to-medium documents. There's no upload time, no server queue, no download step. You drop a file, the operation runs immediately, and the result is ready. For a 2 MB merge or a quick page rotation, the difference is noticeable — you're done before iLovePDF finishes uploading.
For very large files (50+ MB), the dynamic flips. Server-side processing is often faster for heavy operations on large documents because servers have more memory and CPU than your browser tab. Client-side processing uses whatever resources your device has available — which is fine on a modern laptop but can feel sluggish on an older phone.
Platform support
iLovePDF wins here. They have native apps for iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS. The desktop apps work offline. The mobile apps integrate with the system share sheet. If you need to process PDFs on your phone without a browser, iLovePDF has a dedicated app for that.
MakeMyPDF is web-only. It works in any modern browser on any device — desktop, tablet, phone — but there's no native app. The client-side tools work offline once the page is loaded (since there's no server dependency), but you need a browser to access them. For most users who do PDF work at a computer, this is fine. For someone who frequently processes PDFs on their phone, iLovePDF's native app is the better experience.
When to use iLovePDF
- You need a native desktop or mobile app
- You're compressing image-heavy PDFs and need maximum size reduction
- You need an API for automated PDF processing in your software
- You're comfortable with server-side file processing
- You want a single subscription that includes everything
When to use MakeMyPDF
- You work with sensitive, confidential, or regulated documents
- Your organization restricts uploading files to third-party servers
- You want free tools with no account, no caps, and no upsells
- You need tools iLovePDF doesn't offer (redaction, comparison, AI summarization, translation)
- You prefer faster processing on small-to-medium files (no upload/download overhead)
The bottom line
iLovePDF and MakeMyPDF are both solid tools. iLovePDF is more mature, has broader platform support, and offers an API. MakeMyPDF processes most files in your browser without uploading them, costs nothing, and includes several tools the competition doesn't have.
For everyday PDF tasks — merging, splitting, compressing, rotating, signing— both tools get the job done. The decision comes down to whether you prioritize privacy and free access (MakeMyPDF) or native apps and maximum compression quality (iLovePDF). There's no wrong answer. Try both and use whichever one fits.